Видео

alien's are just a cover up for advanced technology we the USA have developed

Bart definitely has the stronger argument, NASA definitely lacking a lot of information on the matter to be honest. I’d like to believe it was real and that happened but the more you think about it , it doesn’t seem like it ever happened. Governments lie. 9/11 , vaccines, Kennedy, every war..

Their Definitely Here Now.

there's over 600 testimonies of which 150 first hand concrning rhe roswell case

This dud Isareal shill

so your opinion is they are seeing venus? have you ever piloted a plane or helicopter?

I guess that's what the guy from the woo tang klan had 😅

I completely agree that thinking of spacetime was always a mistake the negative sign in the s^2 = t^2 - (x^2+y^2+z^2) tells you that time dimension is not like the space dimension. Time has intrinsic direction and by definition it is dynamic. One cannot stand still in time. Space is in that sense static. One can stand still in space. Tim Maudlin also makes the same point about time in spacetime. We should think of 3d space+1d time and no 4d spacetime. One of the other point I have is that the notion of global present is missing from the SR and GR. I know that in SR it is said that there is no simultaneity, but that is always in the sense of one event observed from the point of view of other event. But the notion of global present i.e. ticking of a clock on each of own world line since the Big Bang (say!) should be considered a global present and officially represented into the theory. I know this is a controversial point. But this will get rid of silly notions like, past and present and future events exist. That is just an absurd notion. The very fact that scientists start saying things like what is happening "right now" in Andromeda, we will know only after as many years as the Andromeda is light years away from us. What is that "right now" they are referring to. Another way to think of global present is the events that are same proper time distance away on their own world lines from a common reference point like the Big Bang.

Wolfram description of motion made me think of: Akinetopsia (motion blindness) There are people that are not able to percieve motion. They see the world in freeze frames.

Milankovitch cycle and apophis

Milankovitch cycle

Popularizer, propagandists, occultist.....same grain

This interview isn’t going to age well. 👽🛸

Give a concrete quantum mechanical phenomenon, elegantly and precisely describing said physical phenomenon qualitatively and quantitatively.

Does time run slower for a marathon runner versus a couch potato?

The problem is jargon.

Genius has the power to distill facts into just a few, clear, precise sentences without going around in tortuous circles and seeming to explain nothing using jargon left undefined

More, please.

This guy literally talks and talks and it’s all bs he has no degree in science or physics this guy acts and speaks as what he’s saying is true when he’s literally putting all this info he gets from conversations lmao

UFC cuck whore Joe Rogan peddles garbage to children.

Did u just come from the dentist Brian?

This is the worst podcast I’ve ever heard. Says UFO but all I hear is Harvard and Hamas talk. There’s clickbait and then there’s all out lies. Do not recommend channel please. 🙏

Members of the Trump cult are weighing in!

The earth is only about 14,000 years old . I wish our children would stop be told fairytales of the world being millions of years old. The facts are there , do your homework

LOL, that title a a bold lie. You have not exposed anything. Only put forward you own bias. I"m not saying that the whistleblowers are right. Only that you don't know what your are talking about.

The look on your face says it all, Dr.

We constantly model gravity as acting from outside the objects in the system while gravity actually works from within. So the outside view and time is only the appearance. We are actually objects in the system and gravity time dilates everything including ourselves when we are acted on by both without and within. Has anyone actually conducted QM experiments in Zero G that they've conducted in labs on earth?

Anyone who "understands" quantum mechanics would keep his mouth shut. Tightly. Really tightly. He wouldn't be shooting his mouth off because such a man would control the world. Tightly!

Only a few possibilities when it comes to Aliens. 1. They haven't found us, they are not friendly, and the only resource on this planet that they would need to fight us for is slave labor. If they don't need slaves, they more than likely aren't going to bother us if they see no benefit to it. 2. They have found us, but they are more technologically advanced, and they have avoided making contact because we aren't ready. 3. They are here, and they are monitoring us. They watch us like we watch indigionous tribes that have next to no contact with modern civilization. In the eyes of the aliens, we are the primitive tribe and they are watching us to learn how we do things, and they don't want to disrupt our way of life as much as possible.

Black hole is just a postulation, never been observed.

Danny this podcast sucks

Trust those who seek the truth, doubt those who say that they have found it.

Wonderful video! From a purely epistemological POV the idea that the universe has a beginning is counterintuitive. The evidence does point to that though, but I think we might have it wrong. It's not tired light, it's that the expansion is localized in regions that are less dense, which we call voids. The cosmic filaments are not moving away from one another, the logic being that they are held in a kind of stasis by means of gravity alone, opposed (it is said) by a mysterious force that will eventually rip even the densest matter apart. That's not supported by observation (AFAIK). The filaments are not stationary, because they are somewhat fluid, but they aren't getting further away from one another despite the evidence of expansion. That might be because the expansion only happens locally. The tiny variations in the CMB bear some relation to the density gradient of the modern universe. This is explained by suggesting that dark energy is doing more stretching in the voids, but I think it's possible that the expansion is only happening there. Clearly, the evidence of expansion points to the existence of another powerful force, but we can only see its effect from relatively huge distances, and we have only nascent ideas about its precise nature. If the only tool you have is a hammer, then every problem looks like a nail. So many anomalies have been parked out in the cold because they don't fit with the Big Bang, and every observation that can be made to fit is hailed as yet more evidence. But if the Big Bang wasn't the model then the observations would be made to fit that theory, or parked out in the cold. Anyway, it's all hugely interesting, and eventually we will understand it all. Maybe. lol

Brian Keating, US goverment rarely tells the truth to its people, I am very surprised how gulliable americans have become, it looks like the country has declined to the point that you are discussing how many genders should there be and the whole World is laughing at you dumbasses.

Do you two jews remember the part where God kicked you out of israel twice for being stubbornly evil according to your own history? which is why it has been palestine for 2000 years. Or the 109 countries you were kicked out of in the 2000 years since. Your people are committing sadistic psyhopathic genocide and shamelessly and clumsily lying about everything, no matter how exposed. And you are so despicable that you in all earnesty pretend to be puzzled by objection to that evil. Remember your God who kicked you out and who is exposing your evil for all the world to see in the digital age where nothing will be forgotten.

Opposites don't exist in nature. There I understood qm for you. NEXT!!

How do you extricate the progress of computation from an a priori notion of time? You can say some event A "happens" and then some event B "happens" after A because A causes B. But Im not sure that this is not circular, because causality and time are so closely connected.

Hilarious

Thats assuming we even have the ability to comprehend anything they have to teach, it could be like trying explain trig to a 3 year old

Yes,to much arrogance in science

Well, it sounds like he's got it all figured out. What do all the other eggheads have to say about it?